Nonfiction: An Economist Who Believes Only Government Can Save Capitalism


NYT / Week 7 Views comments

“Individuals, Energy, and Income” goes past analysis to remedy. On the core of Stiglitz’s plan is the strengthening of the state. “The view that authorities is the issue, not the answer, is just flawed. On the contrary, many if not most of our society’s issues, from the excesses of air pollution to monetary instability and financial inequality, have been created by markets.” He proposes an entire host of reforms, together with vital investments in public items like primary analysis, extra stringent regulation of companies and measures to protect and shield the voting franchise.

Credit score

A merciless irony of “Individuals, Energy, and Income” is that in arguing the free market has declined, Stiglitz is competing in a particularly crowded market. The style of “How has America gone flawed?” is overstuffed; we live in a golden age of authors telling People that we not stay in a golden age. Given the plethora of books on this matter, does Stiglitz’s stand out?

One in every of his guide’s comparative benefits is that whereas Stiglitz has impeccable financial credentials, he additionally acknowledges a few of his career’s blind spots. He observes, appropriately, that normal textbook economics talks quite a bit about competitors however little about financial energy. He additionally excels at swatting away bromides concerning the miracles of markets and the failures of governments. He notes, for instance, that the Social Safety Administration is way extra environment friendly at disbursing retirement advantages than personal pensions.

Stiglitz might have executed a lot better, nevertheless, if he had narrowed his focus to the sharpest arguments in his coverage quiver. For example, he discusses the concept taxes on carbon or monetary transactions “can concurrently improve financial efficiency and lift income.” This sounds just like the progressive doppelgänger of the Laffer Curve, that's, an idea that might be good coverage and good politics. Stiglitz must be promoting the hell out of it; as an alternative, he breezes via it in a single web page.

A few of his different concepts appear much less thought out or extra politically poisonous. On antitrust, for instance, he encourages a doctrine of pre-emption: “Regulation of mergers should take into consideration the possible future form of markets.” This might require appreciable foresight, so it's a drawback that 75 pages later Stiglitz permits that “typically there's removed from good details about the place a market might be evolving, and the world seems to be totally different from what we anticipated.” He fails to elucidate how regulators would deal with this conundrum. One other of Stiglitz’s concepts — a public mortgage financing system that would entry a person’s I.R.S. and Social Safety knowledge — sounds unpalatable within the present low-trust political setting.